|
G O V E R N A N C E A N D A D M I N I S T R A T I O N |
|
|
|
Course Syllabi |
|
Department of Public Administration and Urban Studies PhD Program Syllabus 3980:732 Governance and Administration I.
INSTRUCTOR II. COURSE DESCRIPTION This course offers a critical and analytical review of the history of
public administrative theory and its relation to political and administrative
practice. Students are encouraged to compare and contrast management theories
and to examine them in the critical light of practical experience.
Theories of Administration evolved in the public sector (the only
organizations of sufficient size to warrant study) in the mid-18th century.
Based initially upon military models of organization, several European
countries, including
III. COURSE OBJECTIVES
Entrance Competencies Exit Competencies:
IV. COURSE ACTIVITIES TO MEET OBJECTIVES
A. Students are expected to read and study assignments prior to the class period in which they are presented or discussed. B. Students will conduct research related to a current issue specific to governance in the public and non-profit sectors. The research will integrate both the theoretical and practical and relate to the student's own career, dissertation topic, or the public sector in general. C. The research will serve as the basis of a paper (in a style appropriate to an academic journal). D. The standard for the research paper to which each student will be held is that of a "publishable quality" paper. That standard means among other things that each student must fully and completely adhere to the ethics requirements outlined by the Department and the University. As important, this standard is a statement of the level of excellence to be achieved in the development and production of the paper. That means that it must conform to the expectations of academic journals in terms of length, clarity, organization, grasp of the current literature and advance the community's knowledge on the topic. While we do not expect that every paper produced in this, or any other class, will be published, we do expect that every paper will be of sufficient quality to be given serious consideration by reviewers, if it is submitted to a journal. We fully expect that learning how to create publishable quality research is an evolutionary process. Over time our expectation of the quality and depth of your research will improve and that before the completion of your coursework you will be producing works worthy of publication.
V. GRADING CRITERIA
A. Grades will be assigned accordingly: 94 - or higher A 90 - 93% A- 87 - 89% B+ 84 - 86% B 80 - 83% B- 77 - 79% C+ 74 - 76% C 70 - 73% C- Less than 70% F
B. The final grade will be based upon two criteria: Class participation (25%) Research paper (75%)
VI.
REQUIRED AND SUPPLEMENTAL Required Waldo, Dwight
Recommended Appleby, Paul H. Empirical Research Diversity and Responsiveness in a Government Agency Weekend #1 (September 6- 7) 2. Discussion Topics: Introduction to course; political theory, democracy and public administration… the vision of Dwight Waldo Weekend #2 (October 4- 5) 2. Discussion Topics: Intellectual and practical underpinnings of governance. Transparency, participation and “public” decision-making Weekend #3 (November 1- 2) 2. Discussion Topics: Citizens, not customers and other notions. What is a community? Why is it important? Weekend #4 (December???) 2. Discussion Topics How do “bureaucrats” govern? How should “bureaucrats” govern? Journal article due
|
Copyright 2002 Raymond Cox III, Ph.D.
Website designed Matthew Sweeney.
Last updated March 2003
(The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the page author.
The contents of this page have not been reviewed or
approved by The