|
D O C T O R A L C O L L O Q U I U M |
|
|
|
Course Syllabi |
|
Department of Public Administration and Urban Studies PhD in Urban Studies and Public Affairs Raymond W. Cox
III, PhD
Department of Public
Administration and Urban Studies Polsky, Room 266A 330.972.7618 Meeting schedule: Alternating Wednesdays 5:00 –
6:15PM, both Fall and Spring semesters I.
COURSE TITLE 3980:780 PhD Colloquium II.
COURSE DESCRIPTION The purpose of this course is to introduce new
doctoral students to the perspectives and practices of doctoral study. This is an un-graded (credit/ non-credit
only) course required of all first year doctoral students, though attendance
and participation by other doctoral students is encouraged. As a faculty, we wish to ensure that our
students have a sense of the vocations of teaching, research and service that
are the foundations of the academy.
This course is our attempt to provide a window into the norms and
practices that define the academic world.
We hope and expect that students will gain from this course a better
sense of “place” and a firmer sense of how to successfully
navigate through the curriculum to a quality dissertation. We seek to accomplish the following goals in this
course: Ø To offer a
forum in which to discuss concerns and questions that is part of the process
of gaining an education. Ø To ensure
that all students share a common understanding of the rules and procedures
that will govern their studies Ø To acquaint
doctoral students with a fuller understanding of the roles and practices of faculty
within a department and university. Ø To gain an
understanding of the ethos, ethic and intellectual approach that shapes the
“culture” of academe. Ø To help
establish a “learning community” and support network for both
part-time and full-time students III.
METHODS AND PERSPECTIVES This course meets on alternate weeks throughout
the first two semesters of classes for all students in the PhD, regardless of
specialization. The emphasis is on socialization and enculturation into the
academy. We want each of you to get better acquainted with each other and
with the faculty. Our conversations
will be wide-ranging. Not only will we
discuss the technical and administrative details of this journey, but we will
also discuss the intellectual, philosophical and sociological elements of the
pursuit of a doctorate, and by implication of being a junior faculty
member. We have a discussion schedule
established, but as events unfold there may be times when other issues and
concerns may take precedence.
Therefore, these are informal affairs.
Some meetings will be scheduled off campus. IV.
CLASS/DISCUSSION SCHEDULE Fall Semester ·
August 30: Introduction to course, schedule and
format. Doctoral education in
perspective. The curriculum….and
other questions great and small. DAASPA. The faculty, who we are and what we
do. ·
September 13: Discussion with individual faculty
about research interests. (continued). ·
September 27: Discussion with individual faculty
about research interests. (continued). ·
October 11: Discussion with faculty about research
interests (continued). ·
October 25: Discussion with faculty about research
interests (continued). ·
November 8: Research and writing; preliminary tips
and suggestions. Academic writing… the art and craft of writing a
journal article. ·
November 22: Program of Study Committee, who
should be on it, and why. Spring Semester ·
January 17: Why do we have comprehensive
examinations? When and where. Purpose and meaning. ·
January 31: Dissertation Committee, who should be
on it and why. The dissertation in
conceptual perspective. Defining a
topic, structuring the research, scope and character of the project. ·
February 14: The Nature of the
“Academic” Life; the rhythms, folk wisdom, false impressions and
realities. ·
February 28: The transition from student to
faculty member. On being a faculty member… the ethos and the
expectation. ·
March 14: Program of Study Committee redux. ·
April 11: Meet the authors…. A discussion about the latest work of the
faculty and students. ·
April 25: Critiquing the course, suggestions for
improvement.
|
Copyright 2002 Raymond Cox III, Ph.D.
Website designed Matthew Sweeney.
Last updated March 2003
(The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the page author.
The contents of this page have not been reviewed or
approved by The